Apple Inc.(NASDAQ:AAPL)
has opposed the settlement proposal of the US Department of Justice in a legal
memo on Wednesday. The proposal would require the company to take apart its
present e-book business structure with three publishing houses.
paidContent was the
first one to report Apple’s filing. It was a response to a recent DoJ note in
support of a planned settlement that asked the New York district court to put
down a decision without any future hearings. The government has placed an
argument that a quick fast judgment would be the best decision that can be
taken in interest of customers as well as the settling parties as they would
not be required to pay fees for ongoing lawsuit.
Apple’s counsel
expresses disagreement by writing that the proposed judgment would put an end
to Apple’s bargained-for contracts. The decision made by the court would be
ultimate and irreversible as the company would not be able to reinstate
terminated contracts if it had to win a lawsuit in future.
Get Complete Live Rumours On AAPL
The issue seems to be
the agency model of Apple that allows a publisher to set e-book pricing in a
favorable agreement that forbids the company to offer the same content to other
resellers at a lower cost. As per DoJ, Apple and its publishing partner has
used the business plan to fabricate inflation of e-book rates. This has hurt
consumers.
Apple thinks that a
settlement would illegally penalize the company. It is seeking more relief than
a negative post-trial outcome would generate.
Apple mentioned that it
thinks it is all a big conspiracy to compel Amazon to adopt the agency model.
Two book publishers,
who were names in the settlement, has also filed opposition petitions on
Wednesday with Penguin taking help of sales figures that support the agency
model.
Of late, DoJ has
dismissed 868 public comments that were made in favor of Apple’s e-book sales
model.
No comments:
Post a Comment