The FRAND contract trial between Apple
Inc.(NASDAQ:AAPL) and Google Inc(NASDAQ:GOOG) is slated to start on 5th
November. However, since Judge Posner canceled the patent infringement trail
between Apple and Motorola Mobility, it would not be wrong to guess that the
FRAND trial will face the same fate.
On Friday, Judge Barbara Crabb had behaved in
somewhat unfavorable manner to Apple’s qualified eagerness to enter into a
patent license agreement. Apple had mentioned that it would take authorization
to Motorola’s wireless SEPs on the basis of a court determined FRAND royalty
fee and only if the rate does not exceed $1/ iPhone. Apple also said that it
would tire out all appeals and allow the entirely-owned Google subsidiary to
continue with its SEP breach actions.
Judge Crabb is not keen on ordering Motorola to
make Apple a proposal if the sole purpose of the offer will be to provide Apple
with a negotiating chip. At a pretrial meeting, Judge Crabb had already
expressed concerns over deciding a FRAND rate that may be only used as a
negotiating tool between both the parties. She has given this question further
thought and now is of the opinion that it would not be fitting if she grants
Apple’s clarified request for particular performance.
Judge Crabb is not willing to order Motorola to
make a licensing offer to Apple and also she is not prepared to wrap up that
the court would not announce a specific FRAND rate for Motorola’s patents. She
raises the question of what purpose would be served by a declaration on court’s
behalf that Motorola’s actions entailed a violation of its FRAND contracts.
Apple is confronted with two challenges at the
moment. It needs to deal with Judge Crabb’s concerns at the legal level. It
also needs to stop behaving like an arrogant litigant trying to take advantage
of the court system.
No comments:
Post a Comment